Power Computing Timeline
« previous entry | next entry »
Mar. 3rd, 2008 | 00:40
GPS: 99204
zeitgeist:
busy
now playing: “Kalimba Story” - Earth Wind & Fire
To get for desktop in the next 6 months:
1) External FireWire (IEEE 1394) storage, 1⁄2 Tb or greater.
2) 4 Gb RAM (4x1Gb DIMM); maxing out system
3) 10.5 Leopard (Family volume license)
4) 6x11" Wacom Intuos tablet
5) Second laptop, which doesn't sound like a jet engine, for Linux and computer science
In the next 2-4 Years:
1) 64-128 Gb SSD for Laptop
2) Multi-core, multi-processor XenonPowerMac MacPro (A simple drop-in where the G5 is now)
3) More SATA HDDs to setup G5 as highly-capable, quiet server
4) iPhone with 128 Gb Flashmemory*
5) AirPort Hub, with Gigabit Ethernet
6) Smaller, lighter laptop with SSD (eeePC? 12" MacBook Air? — laptops are and always will be secondary computers in most cases)
Naturally, this new hardware also requires that I have a job to pay for it, too. I'm working on that.
--
*Five years ago, in 2003, the 30 Gb iPod cost the same as the 32Gb iPod Touch does to-day. It's speculation, but with the increasing capacities and the decreasing prices for SSDs and Flash memory, I'm expecting the capacities to rival the size of to-day's HDDs in a couple years, by the time I'm in the market for a new phone to replace my BlackBerry. Hopefully, by that time, the iPhone will no longer be locked to a cingular network. Yes, that was also a terrible pun.
1) External FireWire (IEEE 1394) storage, 1⁄2 Tb or greater.
2) 4 Gb RAM (4x1Gb DIMM); maxing out system
3) 10.5 Leopard (Family volume license)
4) 6x11" Wacom Intuos tablet
5) Second laptop, which doesn't sound like a jet engine, for Linux and computer science
In the next 2-4 Years:
1) 64-128 Gb SSD for Laptop
2) Multi-core, multi-processor Xenon
3) More SATA HDDs to setup G5 as highly-capable, quiet server
4) iPhone with 128 Gb Flashmemory*
5) AirPort Hub, with Gigabit Ethernet
6) Smaller, lighter laptop with SSD (eeePC? 12" MacBook Air? — laptops are and always will be secondary computers in most cases)
Naturally, this new hardware also requires that I have a job to pay for it, too. I'm working on that.
--
*Five years ago, in 2003, the 30 Gb iPod cost the same as the 32Gb iPod Touch does to-day. It's speculation, but with the increasing capacities and the decreasing prices for SSDs and Flash memory, I'm expecting the capacities to rival the size of to-day's HDDs in a couple years, by the time I'm in the market for a new phone to replace my BlackBerry. Hopefully, by that time, the iPhone will no longer be locked to a cingular network. Yes, that was also a terrible pun.

(no subject)
from:
phett
date: Mar. 3rd, 2008 13:57 (UTC)
permalink
HA!!
Reply | Thread
Buh? =o.O=
from:
torakiyoshi
date: Mar. 3rd, 2008 17:31 (UTC)
permalink
-=TK
Reply | Thread
Re: Buh? =o.O=
from:
klitaka
date: Mar. 3rd, 2008 18:20 (UTC)
permalink
The internal drives I have total 300 Gb, but are redundant. It's a RAID 1 format (2x300Gb), in which the drives mirror one another, which reduces chances of hardware failure considerably. It's data redundancy. But this is beginning to feel cramped to me -- I have somewhere in the order of 50Gb-90Gb free at any one time (it varies directly with the amount of video on the drive array).
I have far too much music in general, and it'd be nice to convert more of my DVDs to an iPod-ready format.
More than that, though, I shoot video and still photography, and I draw things.
Standard DV footage is about 1Gb/4minutes (250Mb/Min) in an uncompressed DV format on the computer. You can imagine that this would eat up disk space quickly. It's also why I keep all my source tapes.
It's also bad form to import DV footage to the same drive that you run the applications and OS from. Not because it doesn't work, but because there's a significant performance hit because of all the reading and writing to the drive, and a HDD's head can only move so quickly. Ideally, I should have one drive for the footage I'm working with, another drive for the "scratch" or rendered video, and the third from which I run the OS and the application.
These also need to be fast drives, in terms of RPMs, the hard drive bus (usually SATA these days) can handle the data, but if the drive can't spin and write fast enough, frames will be dropped. One of my friends experienced this first hand, importing DV footage to his Dell laptop. Laptop drives just don't spin fast enough to keep up with DV footage -- at least the 4200 RPM drives of the past few years. When we plugged in a scratch drive, the computer could actually import and edit footage, albeit rather begrudgingly with its meagre 512Mb of RAM.
My camera is takes 10 Megapixel shots, too. I normally shoot in JPG, but the size of these is still on average between 3 and 4 Mb apiece. The 8 Gb card I shoot with lets me take almost 2000 shots in JPG format, but if I switch to RAW (which I really should do), I can fit about a quarter of that number -- about 450 images/8Gb or about 55/Gb in RAW. I have not yet filled my card completely, but I should get some other cards, too, for safety. It would be smarter to trust eight separate 1Gb cards than one 8Gb card.
But I have photos dating back a ways, and a fairly large library of photos as well. I don't know the size off-hand, but it's about 15k. Admittedly, a lot of these are useless photos, but I like having all of them, because the whole showing of photos, good and bad, helps establish the zeitgeist of when the photos were taken.
And drawing things takes up space, too; I usually scan things at about 600dpi, and though I have been saving to zipped TIFF files which are smaller than Photoshop files, full-resolution scans take up a large amount of space.
I could have probably stated that more simply: Archival, storage, and backup of video and photos. But I like explaining, too. So long as it's not too much to read.
Reply | Previous Level | Thread
Re: Buh? =o.O=
from:
torakiyoshi
date: Mar. 3rd, 2008 23:24 (UTC)
permalink
-=TK
Reply | Previous Level | Thread
Re: Buh? =o.O=
from:
klitaka
date: Mar. 3rd, 2008 18:25 (UTC)
permalink
Also, this naturally all hinges around the ability to make money. If not, the setup I have now is sufficient for another year or so, but the external drive I have is rather sketchy.
And I should probably move the new tablet further up on the list, as the one I have is partially broken and aggravates me.
And balancing money also means balancing things I do with others, which includes thinking about things like cons. True to form, like most, I have very little money, so I do need to to plan ahead significantly. I'm working on the "getting a job" bit, though, so I will actually have a positive cashflow.
Reply | Previous Level | Thread
Re: Buh? =o.O=
from:
torakiyoshi
date: Mar. 3rd, 2008 23:26 (UTC)
permalink
*nodnods* I hear you on the cash flow issue. It's been quite a while since I've been in the black.
-=TK
Reply | Previous Level | Thread
Re: Buh? =o.O=
from:
klitaka
date: Mar. 4th, 2008 01:22 (UTC)
permalink
But there's still the archival of photos from Newspaper my senior year, and a vast number of the photos from this summer at camp. I think I averaged some 24000 shutter presses for the summer (eleven weeks, which by the end of I despised the Canon PowerShot that I had used).
Reply | Previous Level | Thread